Life Almost Certainly Began in Comet says Astrobiologist

We have here the typical delusional thinking of atheistic scientists. They cannot believe that God created life and they now know that honest mathematics cannot support life starting on earth by chance, so this one says it undoubtedly began in space on a slushy comet, with warm watery clay pools. Nevermind, that no such comets have ever been found. These scientists contradict each other all the time. Just yesterday, I read from a scientist that life could not have survived any trip from a comet to the surface of the earth so he says life on earth could not have started on a comet. Just think how much money could be saved by not funded all your God forsaken studies.

If life started without God speaking it into existence we have no purpose, we are just an accident that will one day cease and there will be nothing alive to even know we existed. So what is the real point in having faith in nothing anyway? It is an exercise in futility.

FOXNews.com – Scientist: Life Almost Certainly Began in Comet – Science News Current Articles: “Life almost undoubtedly began in space, and specifically in the hearts of comets, rather than on Earth, a new study claims. Chandra Wickramasinghe, an astrobiologist at Cardiff University in Wales, and his team say their calculations show that it is one trillion trillion times more likely that life started inside a slushy comet than on Earth. ‘The comets and the warm watery clay pools in comets are settings in which the organic molecules are transformed into living structures in comets,’ Wickramasinghe said. ‘That transformation is more likely in some comet somewhere in the galaxy than in any small pond on the Earth.'”

Share

4 thoughts on “Life Almost Certainly Began in Comet says Astrobiologist

  1. Just today I read that Homo Erectus “may have been a lot more ‘ape-like’ than previously thought” in an article named ‘Ancient human fossils show women much smaller‘. And about two weeks ago I read that Kenyan scientists had concluded that Homo Erectus and Homo Habilis lived together and are ‘sister species rather than mother and daughter’ according to the article ‘Skull, jaw fossils offer new insight into human lineage‘ published by the Los Angeles Times. I even saw it on the news here in Belgium and one of the scientists said there is absolutely ‘no doubt’ that the two species lived together. People here in Belgium as in much of Europe believe you’re crazy or a fanatic for not believing in Darwinian evolution. I don’t see why. It would take me a lot of effort to the point that blind acceptance would be required to believe in the theory of Evolution. Btw, the funny thing about this is that even if the concensus changes and scientists accept that Homo Habilis and Homo Erectus lived simulataneously, they’ll have to rewrite the history books completely for as far as I know there’s no other ‘linking species’ between Australopithecus Africanus and Homo Erectus other than Homo Habilis. Just to add to your conclusion that science is simply unreliable in some cases because we as mere human beings can never perfectly conceive how exactly things became the way they are. Creation is the only logical answer.

  2. Thanks for your insights. Lets face it, Brussels did not get to be the headquarters of the EU for no reason. It is the center of evolutionary belief which always leads to godless humanistic thought.

  3. Actually not so long ago I read this article according to which the Council of Europe based in Strasbourg says that people who believe in Creationism and/or are pro-Life are a threat to human rights. A German who compared abortion to the holocaust has even spent time in jail for his remarks. All this says enough about the true nature of the EU; it is one that goes against Biblical beliefs. I think once the former Soviet states that are now EU member states have forgotten about life under Communism, we’re going to see campaigns against practising believers increase and intensify.

Comments are closed.