After a highly ranked article I wrote on sexual perversion and another one I wrote on the polices in China just completely vanish out of the Google database my first thought was censorship. I do not know if that actually occurred but it certainly made me think about the subject. I now believe there will soon come a day when absolute truths expressed in the Bible will no longer be allowed to be posted on the Internet. I also believe that day will not be very far in the future, in fact, in China it is already occurring.
Post navigation
4 thoughts on “Internet censorship will come from government directives or search engine companies policies”
Comments are closed.
Hi Don.
Do you really believe that we have one to two decades to get the word out. I do hope that you are right in what you say. The experiences I have had & studies that I do, I must admit lead me to think that the time left to us is somewhat shorter than that.
Though I do hope that you are right in what you say, as the longer time we have to reach those who have not heard the truth the better.
Your 3 reasons for certain things to happen are as usual very logical & I believe spot on. One you talk about is two attacks on the US, Can you say why you believe two attacks. I would think that now Mr Bush has managed to bring in the reformed & reborn patriot act, I would have thought that all they would need to activate that would be one attack only. Mind you they would have to prove that such a attack was lets say of terrorist origins & that would be to prove it of being of Islamic origins.
Once they had done that, I do not think that they would need much more of an excuse to point the guns of war at they country they had at the top of there all time fav list.
So could you please say why you think two attacks on the US.
As for the censorship on the web, I like you have come across lets just say unexplained things for certain things disappearing. So I think like you this is going on now to a certain degree & I believe it is going to get a lot worse very soon. You say about free speech being in your constitution, well its supposed to be over here in the UK also, but they are finding ways to stop it & I believe you would agree with with me that they would & do the same over in the US, they will & do find ways to stop it if they think it detrimental in any way to what they, that is the powers that be, want the general public to be made aware of.
I do believe that we are so close to the person who’s name is the last in the book, to make that commitment. We are so close it is frightening. Frightening for all those who ignore the truth, but exciting for all who wait in anticipation of our Lords return.
God Bless you always
831
Hi Gary,
The time to get the word out certainly can be shorter then one or two decades it all really depends on what happens in the world. I really did say “at most” we have one or two decades to get these truths out.
I say it will take two major terrorist attacks to bring censorship of free speech because I do not think one attack would cause enough terror to allow for passage of laws to take away the freedom we have in this country to make religious expressions.
If a series of attacks occurred in a fairly rapid sequence people will be willing to give up many of their freedoms for security. They would just give the government the power to do just about anything it sees fit.
In that case, you can be sure that any website that teaches end time theology or the fundamentals of their faith that does agree with the worldview of the world power brokers would be censored. They would be banned as subversive or inflammatory and a danger to peace and security.
I do not see that happening after one 9/11 type attack but I do think that two or more such attacks will quickly bring about this radical change in thinking.
Hi Don.
Thanks for that, I just thought that it needed a little bit of clarifying, in those area’s.
I totally agree with you as you know. As for the censorship, I have had so many instances where I have tried to get into a site I know I have had links to & there is no way I have been allowed into them. I have then had to search & search using all different kinds of links from all kinds of sites to try to get back into these places.
They are doing that now as we all know. Its so annoying to say the least.
The reason I asked about the amount of attacks needed to bring in certain legislation. Its just that I read that Mr Bush had managed to bring in the new & revised Patriot act & I just thought that now he has that in place, he would not need a second prod with a big stick to activate the whole act.
You live out there I do not, so as with anything else I can only go of the news info I get. You have more info at hand in your own country than I do. I do pray that you are right, but after saying that I can see that if he gets the chance in the foreseeable future, he will activate it. I do not think that this will be to long off as it will also give him the chance to stay in office & it will also suspend the whole constitution, hence becoming a police state run dictatorship.
I do pray that I am wrong.
God Bless you always
831.
ps. I have to go into hospital for two weeks now so, you will have a bit of peace, te he.
The extension of the Patriot act with some modifications was voted on by congress and was passed to combat terrorism.
There is no version of the Patriot act that Bush can just activate to suspend the constitution. You have been reading too much conspiracy nonsense found on the internet.
The Patriot act does give the government some powers that it would not normally have but nothing in the act takes away religious freedoms.
The only way the constitution could be suspended is if congress passed a law to allow that to happen due to war or a grave national crises and the Supreme court upholds that these wartime powers are constitutional.
Even if congress did give new powers to the executive branch they would put limits on the executive powers and they would only allow the powers for a specific period of time.
The only way a dictatorship could happen in the United States is if the people of the United States wanted a dictatorship and voted in a radically different form of government and changed the constitution.
All military members in the United States are swore to uphold the constitution and they would.
A president has limited power in the United States because if congress does not fund an executive order of the president there can be no staff hired to enact or enforce it. Thus, most executive orders are just contingency plans for a national crises or wishful thinking. The crises would have to come first and that is why several major terrorist attacks would have to take place first.
If a president tried to implement something that was against the constitution without support by all branches of government he would be impeached and removed from office.
God be with you in the hospital